5 years ago andrew leaned agree on:
andrew replied:
The Tyler Cowen "stubborn attachments" view is on here :)
5 years ago andrew agreed with:
andrew posted a comment:
If this is true, you don't need to feel like an uninformed, irresponsible non-adult for not closely following the news. If anything really consequential shows up on the news that will have long-term impacts, it will be hard not to find out about it anyway.
andrew posted a reason to agree:
Lawrence Lessig makes a case for why this is important in Republic Lost.
5 years ago andrew was undecided on:
andrew posted a reason to disagree:
My suspicion is that this view at least partly reflects unrealistic expectations for high-frequency news media. If you consider daily news in a role more like popular TV shows or sports events, it provides some common topics for people to talk about, whether or not those topics are actually the most important things to think about overall. Watching the news to be informed about what's important might simply be a category mistake.
My own behavior suggests I've at least subconsciously noticed this: for topical/watercooler information, I'm more likely to gravitate towards things that are obviously just entertainment. If I want to be better informed on what's important, I look for longer-form journalism, books, etc.
5 years ago steven.noble leaned disagree on:
One of the biggest things that makes me suspicious of this is that people are already highly motivated to grow their own parts of the economy for selfish reasons, so are more likely to believe this to be true for their case. It might or might not actually be true in particular cases, but I'd worry that this idea ends up just getting used to make people feel morally justified to do what they already want to do.
andrew posted a problem with the view:
One potential problem with this framing is that "political power" isn't separated into "whose goals do we try to achieve?" vs. "how do we try to achieve the goals". I could imagine one arguing that the first part should be evenly distributed but the second should not.
5 years ago steven.noble, andrew were undecided on:
I've now added a "Related views" feature that allows capturing this sort of incremental improvement in the quality of views due to the discussion, and added related views for this one.
I'm not sure if this might be difficult from a legal perspective, conflicting with the usual "AS-IS, NO WARRANTY" terms attached to most OSS licenses.
5 years ago andrew disagreed with:
5 years ago andrew leaned agree on, steven.noble disagreed with:
steven.noble posted a reason to agree:
There was a Microsoft 4 day work week trial in Japan that seems to support this https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/04/tech/microsoft-japan-workweek-productivity/index.html
5 years ago steven.noble agreed with, andrew was undecided on:
steven.noble replied:
5 years ago steven.noble agreed with, andrew leaned agree on:
5 years ago andrew, steven.noble were undecided on:
5 years ago steven.noble, ben were undecided on, andrew leaned disagree on:
5 years ago steven.noble, andrew leaned agree on:
5 years ago andrew leaned agree on, steven.noble leaned disagree on:
andrew replied:
The Tyler Cowen "stubborn attachments" view is on here :)